Showing 2 results for Impaired Fasting Glucose
Farzad Najafipour, Masoumeh Zareizadeh,
Volume 4, Issue 1 (7-2004)
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes is a hereditary disease but the inheritance and responsible genes have not been clearly clarified yet.
According to the most studies, diabetes is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity in populations. Diabetes occurs in 30% of first degree family members of diabetic patients, But most people are not aware of their disease.
Methods: We studied first degree relatives of type 2 diabetes and screened them for diabetes, IFG and IGT.174 families(1556 people) of Tabriz residents were studied, among them 1232 persons grater than 30 years were alive and FBS and OGTT were done in this group .
Results: According to this study, 1232 persons were alive and 324 persons had died and DM was found in 343 (27.9%) and 82 (25.3%) of them respectively. We found 179 (14.5%) persons with IFG and 89 (7.2%) with IGT.The percent of diabetes in offspring and siblings were 32.9% and 22.1% respectively. The majority of patients had 41 – 50 years old. Risk of diabetes among offspring who had diabetes in both parents was more than the ones who had diabetic father or mother. In this study, women with diabetes were more than men (32.4% vs. 22.2% respectively). The prevalence of Diabetes type 2 in first-degree relatives was more frequent between sister and brother (41.95%), followed by that between father and son (10.9%).
Conclusion: Prevalence of diabetes in most populations is 8 – 10 %. If diabetes occurs in someone, risk of development of diabetes will increase to 30% in their family members. Therefore, screening must be done in all family members of diabetic patients to recognize the problem and to prevent from diabetes complication.
Farzad Hadaegh, Hadi Harati, Asghar Ghasemi, Maryam Tohidi, Azadeh Zabetian, Mojgan Padyab, Fereidoun Azizi,
Volume 6, Issue 1 (8-2006)
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the level of agreement between the impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and abnormal glucose tolerance before and after application of the new IFG definition and to evaluate the impact of adding common clinical data on this agreement.
Methods: A cross sectional population based study was carried out in an Iranian urban population which enrolled 8766 men and women over 20 years. Fasting and 2-hour plasma glucose were measured in all subjects excluding those with previously diagnosed diabetes and fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl. The diagnostic parameters and kappa coefficient between the previous and revised definitions of IFG for detecting impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and dysglycemia (IGT and diabetes) were calculated. Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis were used to determine the independent clinical risk factors and their optimal cut-points associated with IGT and dysglycemia.
Results: After using the new criteria, sensitivity of IFG for detecting IGT or dysglycemia increased but specificity and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) decreased and the κ slightly improved (0.16 to 0.29 for IGT and 0.24 to 0.35 for dysglycemia). Adding the clinical data to the revised criteria considerably improved the agreement between IFG with IGT and dysglycemia (κ increased from 0.286 to 0.470 for IGT and from 0.354 to 0.574 for dysglycemia). This also increased the LR+ from 3.86 to 14.5 and from 4.46 to 17.4 respectively for detecting IGT or dysglycemia.
Conclusion: The new IFG definition in combination with common clinical risk factors most likely predicts IGT and dysglycemia.
